The depiction of a God figure in the comic who rewards right actions and punishes wrong ones appears to be grounded in an absolutist moral framework. However, ethical relativism argues that moral values are not universal but vary according to cultural and individual contexts. In this sense, labeling an action as ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ only holds meaning within a specific normative structure. Free will, on the other hand, is the capacity of individuals to choose their own values despite such norms. If a universal moral system is imposed, free will becomes merely a theoretical concept. Ethical pluralism and free will should be able to coexist; otherwise, it becomes impossible to truly acknowledge the differences among conscious beings.
you see, as he is The heaven you could call him an absolute God (even if he isn’t all powerful). That would mean he says what is right and wrong, and as a common misconception, you would still have free will to do the right and wrong and they can have their values of what is right or wrong. Yes, they would be going against heaven and the objective truth, but free will would still be there and allow them to believe in a world that suits them in particular (or their society)
Vgdhnj
The depiction of a God figure in the comic who rewards right actions and punishes wrong ones appears to be grounded in an absolutist moral framework. However, ethical relativism argues that moral values are not universal but vary according to cultural and individual contexts. In this sense, labeling an action as ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ only holds meaning within a specific normative structure. Free will, on the other hand, is the capacity of individuals to choose their own values despite such norms. If a universal moral system is imposed, free will becomes merely a theoretical concept. Ethical pluralism and free will should be able to coexist; otherwise, it becomes impossible to truly acknowledge the differences among conscious beings.
Venomous
Bro tf u wrote u should be writing a novel instead of coming here 😕
Ambrosius
you see, as he is The heaven you could call him an absolute God (even if he isn’t all powerful). That would mean he says what is right and wrong, and as a common misconception, you would still have free will to do the right and wrong and they can have their values of what is right or wrong. Yes, they would be going against heaven and the objective truth, but free will would still be there and allow them to believe in a world that suits them in particular (or their society)